A place for the life you want to practise
Different places.
The same whole person.
Bring your chart into conversation with your life.
Compare a familiar city with two alternatives. Keep the astrology, your lived experience and the practical questions in view.
Explore your places ↓An independent Stjernerne proposal for Moses’s review. His method, voice, brand association and commercial involvement have not been approved.
01 / The natal foundation
Start with the recorded details.
Alex Linden is a fictional example: 17 February 1988, 14:20 London, GMT (14:20 UTC). Your entries stay in this tab and clear on reload.
02 / Same moment · a different local sky
What changes with place?
The planets keep their geocentric positions. Local angles and houses change. These six locations are the fixed demonstration set; custom destinations are part of a future agreed version.
Porphyry · ten planets, Ceres, Chiron and the lunar-node axis. The node axis is counted once in the aspect analysis.
The House Lens Check
Agreement supplies a stable starting point. Differences remain visible; a body within 1° of a cusp is flagged, never silently moved.
An original comparison of Porphyry, Equal and Whole Sign. It does not reproduce Triangulated Houses.
Five birth-time samples · ±2 minutes
At −2, −1, 0, +1 and +2 minutes, the houses and angles are recalculated. This diagnostic does not rectify a birth time or prove stability between the samples.
All positions, house cusps and natal aspects
03 / Your life supplies the context
A chart cannot supply your history.
The example button supplies invented context. It is not inferred from anyone’s chart.
Read Alex’s full example.
The fixed 30-page atlas follows Chicago, Portland and Asheville through natal synthesis, relocation, lived history, the house cross-check and practical experiments. It is separate from the short, recalculated brief above. Its Lahiri comparison table is retained; this live demo calculates tropical positions only.
Read the full fictional sample ↗A demonstration with no orders, payments or emails. The full Western/Vedic synthesis, Triangulated Houses method and production report require Moses’s specifications and approval.
A possible collaboration
A personal atlas.
A clearly shared task.
Moses’s part
Choose and approve the method, scope and editorial voice for a personal report his audience or students could receive. Define which parts require his own specialist review.
Johannes’s part
Handle the agreed calculations, writing, design, personalisation, production and delivery. The proposed model does not ask Moses to write each customer’s report.
Suggested first step: one 15–20-minute review of the three-city comparison and one passage from Alex’s sample, followed by one round of comments. This is a proposed review allowance; a full method specification would be a separate task.
Terms remain open: no partnership price, revenue share, minimum volume, turnaround or recurring review workload has been agreed. Any pilot and commercial terms need a separate written agreement.
Putting a future generator on a website
- Approve the report method, permitted branding, destination inputs, interpretive content and review responsibilities.
- Add a dedicated page or button linking to a hosted generator. An embedded frame is an alternative only after testing mobile height, accessibility and the host’s security rules.
- Connect a secure order service with consent, a report choice and an agreed price. Keep test payments separate. Use a verified payment event to release an order exactly once.
- Send the authorised birth data to the production service, produce and check the report, then deliver via an expiring private download and the agreed notification. Define retention, corrections and support before launch.
None of those order, payment or delivery connections is active here. No customer data is stored by this demo.